<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ali Abunimah &#8211; defending the right to compare Israelis to Nazis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fleshisgrass.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/ali-abunimah-defending-the-right-to-compare-israelis-to-nazis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fleshisgrass.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/ali-abunimah-defending-the-right-to-compare-israelis-to-nazis/</link>
	<description>The record.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://fleshisgrass.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/ali-abunimah-defending-the-right-to-compare-israelis-to-nazis/#comment-7750</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fleshisgrass.wordpress.com/?p=2351#comment-7750</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s also 2 ways in which the use of the Nazi analogy (distinct from other demonizing analogies) is problematic. First, it&#039;s an appropriation -a claim to ownership- of the Jewish experience. It makes a lot of sense that Jews should have some leeway to describe antisemitism (and Nazi antisemitism as a particular case) that others should not be able to coopt. Second, there are times when it&#039;s consciously chosen as a way of picking at an open wound in the Jewish psyche. These depend on where you sit in relation to the Jewish community - whether you are Jewish is an important part of the context that affects the meaning and interpretation. In other words, even if there is a double standard, that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s hypocritical. (A similar case might be the use of the n-word among whites and blacks.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s also 2 ways in which the use of the Nazi analogy (distinct from other demonizing analogies) is problematic. First, it&#8217;s an appropriation -a claim to ownership- of the Jewish experience. It makes a lot of sense that Jews should have some leeway to describe antisemitism (and Nazi antisemitism as a particular case) that others should not be able to coopt. Second, there are times when it&#8217;s consciously chosen as a way of picking at an open wound in the Jewish psyche. These depend on where you sit in relation to the Jewish community &#8211; whether you are Jewish is an important part of the context that affects the meaning and interpretation. In other words, even if there is a double standard, that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s hypocritical. (A similar case might be the use of the n-word among whites and blacks.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
