I finally learn something from PACBI

Leeds Student Union is having a nail-biting referendum on whether or not to adopt the EUMC Working Definition of Anti-Semitism. I think it’s a good definition which leaves plenty of leeway for everybody’s favourite pursuit: ‘criticising’ Israel. However, some Israel critics find themselves at at a loss for how to operate under it and are loud in their lament. My feeling is that these people are antisemitic and in denial. But there’s no telling them.

PACBI is an Israel-boycotting organisation led by a choreographer called Omar Barghouti. Whenever I think of PACBI I think of Saen Sans’ Danse Macabre.


PACBI are urging Leeds students to reject the EUMC definition because PACBI depends on antisemitism to function.

What I learnt from them today is that Jews Against Zionism, their definitive source on what we should think about Zionism, have only got 150,000 members. What percentage is that of 14 million? One and a bit.

I also learn to carry on thinking that PACBI are scarey. They brush concerns about antisemitism aside in a classic example of David Hirsh’s Livingstone Manoevre – even to the extent of using the JAZs as their ventriloquist dummies:

Jews against Zionism, an organization which represents over 150,000 Jews world-wide, commented that “One of the well-known tactics of Zionists to silence their critics is to accuse them of anti-Semitism. Of course, anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism are two separate things.”

It’s well known that antisemitism exists and is increasing throughout Europe. It is also these days, and on the political left, couched in the language of anti-Zionism. The anti-Zionist voices which are not also antisemitic voices are very weak at the moment and they don’t have any answers.

Other racisms are also increasing but the Jews remain an enduring scapegoat – most recently in Mumbai. The Jews targeted, sought out in their community centre and ultimately killed in Mumbai weren’t Israelis – they were plain old Jews.

PACBI comprises people so ignorant and hate-filled that they can’t seem to criticise Israel without getting into bed with Jew haters. This is quite easy to avoid. Just take a cool, unprejudiced look at the situation (there are 10 of these – simply insert the relevant number into the Web address).

For the Palestinians, an economy and a commitment to seizing political process bull by the horns. A return to negotiations and abandoning the murderous Hamas Charter. Israel can and must assist with the former, by facilitating free movement, by equitable distribution of resources like water, by sharing technological advances, by freezing and shrinking the settlements, and by withdrawing from the West Bank as soon as possible. The rest is down to the Palestinians. It’s their war too.

7 thoughts on “I finally learn something from PACBI

  1. “Jews against zionism” as I understand it is an umbrella for Neturei Karta and other ultra-orthodox wingnuts, many of whom like to hang out in Israel whilst at the same time calling the soldiers who protect them “nazis” and so forth. Does anyone know what this figure of 150k supporters is based on?

  2. JR, is that True Torah Jews Against Zionism they mean, then?

    That would be very weird – it’s like invoking the Anabaptists as evidence that the Catholics have got it wrong.

    I think they might mean the old Greenstein/Rance outfit, now defunct, but the same faces are to be seen in the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network, which may last a year or so before the energy goes out of it and it’s relaunched as something else. Somebody should ask them.

  3. I assume that’s who they mean – I’m not aware of another organisation of that name that has any members. Religious fanatics who detest other Jews to the extent that they look to Ahmedinajad as an agent of divine vengeance. I wonder what the total social security spend of the state of Israel is on “Jews against Zionism”.

  4. Pingback: Weekend Reading, Weekend Grading « The New Centrist

  5. I don’t feel making a comparison of numbers is too helpful, especially when it’s a matter of official members in an organization against the total number of people with religious similarities. I can’t make much more of a comment than that as I don’t feel properly educated in the subject matter.

    Also, I couldn’t agree with the last paragraph more.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s