During Refugee Week

Refugee Week has just gone. In the Ilford Recorder (Thursday 17th June, 2010, p10) Rita Chadha of RAMFEL (Refugee and Migrant Forum of East London), Cardinal Heenan Centre, High Road, Ilford, writes:

“The suggestion that Redbridge is home to thousands of illegal immigrants is simply untrue.

It is unfortunate that in trying to promote their service, M. K. Suri appears to have started a discussion that has sadly developed into the usual cliche hysteria about immigration (Recorder, last week).

The government has introduced what it calls a points-based system which means that only those who have the skills that are needed by the UK labour market are let in. Such individuals are not illegal, they are here, they cannot claim benefits or housing, they take nothing.

Even asylum seekers are not housed in Redbridge. Asylum seekers are not allowed to work, in many cases they cannot study, and they most definitely cannot claim benefits. So how do they survive?

They are dependent on the handouts of charities like ours, should we really in this day and age be providing in excess of 50 food parcels a week? Paid for out of the generosity of local churches, not by taxpayers.

The government does provide those who have stated they wish to claim asylum a subsistence allowance of £35.52 per week, which is 70 percent below the poverty line. And that is it – no freedom pass, no special treatments, no access to college and no right to work. I defy anyone to live like that for 11 years. It is not illegal to claim asylum.

As the ninth most diverse borough in the country, Redbridge should pride itself on being a place where people feel not only comfotable and wish to settle, but also a place where people can and want to make a positive contribution. Redbridge schools and hospitals are full of people here legally and making the lives of all our communities better.

During Refugee Week, we would ask people to take a moment to look at the reality of the situation, rather than believe the half-truths peddled by a few misinformed individuals.”

I think the middle bit was got at by an editor on glue but I transcribed it faithfully because it’s a good and necessary letter.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “During Refugee Week

  1. They are not making the lives and communities of indigenous White Britons better as perceived and experienced by those very indigenous Britons, that’s forsure. They did not ask these people to come to the UK, their treasonoud governments have led these people into the UK against the over wishes of the indigenous British people.

    Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

    The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

    Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

    What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

    How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

    But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    • Dave,

      “Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

      Nobody says that. You should know that wealth, power and white (and male) are correlates in this world, and that a lot of that wealth is based on people from technologically advanced backgrounds in Europe pouring (as you put it) into less advantaged places round the globe and basically plundering them. So just quit going on about British white victimisation, because it doesn’t exist. Disadvantage exists, but not associated with pale skin colour. If you didn’t persistently see social problems through a wonky prism of race you would realise that.

      I don’t think you’re a Nazi – your views are quite ordinarily racist. Thankfully you’re not very persuasive. But I don’t have to let you comment on my blog.

  2. It’s not so much the non-White people that White activists are angry at, rather it is the anglo-elites that are orchistrating and allowing huge numbers of non-Whites to flood into our lands. That’s the point here. They, that is White leaders, are on record as wanting to blend out of existence their own founding gene pool. This is genocide Flesh and they know, and they are now at huge risk of being taken into genocide tribunals and many of them are beginning to realize this.

    Let me ask you this Flesh: Why do my posts anger you so? What is it about my pro-White position that bothers you and causes you to delete my posts? Why is it so bothersome to you that I merely argue that White countries should be only for White people–Which is what the vast majority of White people want. What is so repugnant to this position?

    Thanks

  3. [censored by moderator]

    And not letting me post on your blog…that would be unfortunate Flesh because I enjoy many of your articles. You are a thoughtful and obviously intelligent person. But you also have to remember something here. If you do delete my posts and prevent me from posting, you are going to lose a fair bit of legitimacy with your other readers. And that’s not good. It would better if you just let reply to your posts and then offer counter-points to my arguments.

    Thanks and keep up the good work Flesh

  4. You mean arguments that you don’t like don’t you?
    You have to understand something Flesh, the reason that I sound repetitive is because the basic anti-White positions that you take are repetititve, and to argue them I have to use the same arguments over and over. The reason that I do this is simply because I want you to confront the basic anti-White premises that are so much a part your psyche.

    Thanks

  5. Flesh,

    They don’t like it up ’em and are too thick to get their own blogs, so why not just do what I do, have a no platform for fascists, or their mates like ‘Dave’, policy?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s